For the 2019 launch of the project this week of activity started with the annotation of Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework, focusing on the first two introduction sections (like an array, this second week has an index of 1).
Our Featured Annotator interview series in the Engelbart Framework Annotation expedition continues with Howard Rheingold, whose work has been tremendously influential on me and many, many others who seek to understand the character and potential of the digital age. Howard’s … Continue reading →
Part of the Engelbart Framework Annotation event involves what we’re calling “featured annotators.” As Alan Levine and I discussed the event last fall and early this year, we quickly agreed there should be a meta-layer, or perhaps a meta-meta-layer, in … Continue reading →
Week[1] activity starts with the annotation of Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. We are focusing on the Introduction sections A and B. While we welcome you to annotate anywhere within the paper, we hope you give these sections some attention– start annotating now with Hypothes.is. For those just getting …
In the spring of 2004, I read these words for the first time: We do not speak of isolated clever tricks that help in particular situations. We refer to a way of life in an integrated domain where hunches, cut-and-try, … Continue reading →
It’s a lot to take in. Doug Engelbart’s monumental 1962 research report Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework–really a monograph, and indeed a manifesto–is dense with yearning, with ideas, with analysis, and with a kind of moral philosophy devoted to human … Continue reading →
![What’s Happening in Week[1]?](https://framework.thoughtvectors.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/workspace-749x200.jpg)
